Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Blog Article
If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only accomplished In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In case the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and continue according to your legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
The a lot of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made crystal clear that police is free to take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-field duties while in the interim period. Read more
Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal has not however been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
With the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Safe and sound with him in their home. The therapist confident them that that they had almost nothing to fret about.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents with the boy or girl don't approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they're able to Lower off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that even though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should evaluate the benefit of every one of the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of suitable candidates that are found to get most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored with the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part from the respondent department.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to carry out away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government guidelines for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Consequently, this petition is admissible based on proven court precedents, as well as respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases heard in the state court, on the same level.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could possibly be a person or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for the decision from the check here majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted within an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.